39 Chicago charities, checked against their filings
What do you want your gift to help with?
- Food9 charities
- Literacy8 charities
- Housing10 charities
- Legal aid8 charities
- Violence prevention10 charities
- Jobs4 charities
- Health6 charities
- Women and survivors4 charities
- Environment3 charities
Not sure yet? Show me the strongest evidence across every cause
39
charities, each checked against its IRS filings and Charity Navigator record
$1.29B
spent a year between them, from a food bank to a single neighborhood pantry
0%
taken by GiveChi. Every Donate button goes straight to the charity
Shaded: a charity here names the area. Boundaries: City of Chicago.
Your side of town.
Tap your community area, or choose it here, to see who works there by name, and who works across the whole city.
Show up in person.
Walks, cleanups, plantings and volunteer shifts run by charities on this list. Dates are from each charity’s own site, checked September 25, 2026; confirm before you go.
-
Sep26
Plant trees at Wentworth Gardens
-
Sep26
Stewardship workday at Canal Origins Park
-
Sep26
Mulch the trails at Palmisano Park
-
Sep28
Prune and haul brush in Humboldt Park
-
Sep29
Community tree care day in North Lawndale
-
Oct1
Plant trees at Abraxas Youth & Family Services
-
Oct7
Community tree care day on California Boulevard
-
Oct7
Prune street trees at Hollywood Park
-
Oct10
March and Rally to End Domestic Violence
-
Oct10
Harvest Fest at the South Chicago farm
-
Oct11
Prune trees at Mozart Park
-
Oct13
Coach students at Interview Labs
-
Oct13
Giving Factory @ Night: pack kids’ essentials
-
Oct17
Prune trees at Ravenswood Manor Park
-
Oct30
Volunteer at the College & Leadership Forum
-
Oct31
Plant trees in Irving Park
-
Nov7
Family Volunteer Day
-
Nov10
Giving Factory @ Night: pack kids’ essentials
-
Nov11
Community tree care day at Chicago State University
-
Dec8
Giving Factory @ Night: pack kids’ essentials
-
Dec10
Volunteer Impact Day
-
May8
Chicago-Calumet River Day cleanup
No dated events are coming up right now. The standing shifts below run all year.
Any week

Greater Chicago Food Depository: repack food for pantries; Saturday family days for ages 5 and up

Care for Real: pack food and work the warehouse

Common Pantry: help neighbors shop the pantry

Cradles to Crayons: pack clothing and essentials in the Giving Factory; ages 5 and up

Beyond Hunger: pantry, repacking and home delivery shifts

Nourishing Hope: market, hub and home-delivery shifts, after an orientation

Breakthrough: the Fresh Market pantry, Teen Night, mentoring and after-school help, after an application

Urban Growers Collective: farm tour and volunteer hours; Budding Growers for families

The Resurrection Project: weekly immigration legal-help workshops; training provided
All 39 charities.
Every charity here was checked on September 25, 2026. Open one for why it matters, its numbers and every caution.
Food and basic needs 6
-

Beyond Hunger
Food pantry and home delivery in 13 ZIP codes
-
What “to programs” means
Of every dollar Beyond Hunger spent, about 86 cents went to its programs: the services themselves. The rest paid for management and fundraising.
This is a three-year average (FY2022–FY2024) from its IRS filings. The median here is 82.0%.
Higher is not automatically better: staff, audits and data are what make programs work. This shows how spending is classified; the evidence tag shows whether the programs work.
- 85.7%
- spent a year
- $5.0M
-
-

Care for Real
Food pantries, clothing and home delivery
-
What “to programs” means
Of every dollar Care for Real spent, about 93 cents went to its programs: the services themselves. The rest paid for management and fundraising.
This is a three-year average (FY2023–FY2025) from its IRS filings. The median here is 82.0%.
Higher is not automatically better: staff, audits and data are what make programs work. This shows how spending is classified; the evidence tag shows whether the programs work.
- 93.3%
- spent a year
- $7.1M
-
-

Common Pantry
Client-choice food pantry with hot meals
-
What “to programs” means
Of every dollar Common Pantry spent, about 87 cents went to its programs: the services themselves. The rest paid for management and fundraising.
This is a three-year average (FY2022–FY2024) from its IRS filings. The median here is 82.0%.
Higher is not automatically better: staff, audits and data are what make programs work. This shows how spending is classified; the evidence tag shows whether the programs work.
- 87.1%
- spent a year
- $2.5M
-
-

Cradles to Crayons
Clothing and essentials for children, through social services
- Finances
Two consecutive deficits: $0.99M in FY2024 and $1.61M in FY2025.
-
What “to programs” means
Of every dollar Cradles to Crayons spent, about 89 cents went to its programs: the services themselves. The rest paid for management and fundraising.
This is a three-year average (FY2023–FY2025) from its IRS filings. The median here is 82.0%.
Higher is not automatically better: staff, audits and data are what make programs work. This shows how spending is classified; the evidence tag shows whether the programs work.
- 89.3%
- spent a year
- $50.5M
- Finances
-

Greater Chicago Food Depository
Supplies food to 850+ pantries, kitchens and shelters
- Finances
Small operating deficits in FY2022, FY2023 and FY2025, against $216M in assets.
-
What “to programs” means
Of every dollar Greater Chicago Food Depository spent, about 92 cents went to its programs: the services themselves. The rest paid for management and fundraising.
This is a three-year average (FY2023–FY2025) from its IRS filings. The median here is 82.0%.
Higher is not automatically better: staff, audits and data are what make programs work. This shows how spending is classified; the evidence tag shows whether the programs work.
- 91.8%
- spent a year
- $243M
- Finances
-

Nourishing Hope
Food pantries and grocery delivery, plus counseling
- Finances
FY2025 deficit of $390,000 on a $20M budget.
-
What “to programs” means
Of every dollar Nourishing Hope spent, about 86 cents went to its programs: the services themselves. The rest paid for management and fundraising.
This is a three-year average (FY2023–FY2025) from its IRS filings. The median here is 82.0%.
Higher is not automatically better: staff, audits and data are what make programs work. This shows how spending is classified; the evidence tag shows whether the programs work.
- 85.8%
- spent a year
- $20.0M
- Finances
Literacy and education 7
-

After School Matters
Paid after-school apprenticeships for high school teens
- Funding risk
Heavily dependent on City of Chicago and CPS funding, both under 2026 budget strain. No cut specific to this organization was found.
-
What “to programs” means
Of every dollar After School Matters spent, about 83 cents went to its programs: the services themselves. The rest paid for management and fundraising.
This is a three-year average (FY2022–FY2024) from its IRS filings. The median here is 82.0%.
Higher is not automatically better: staff, audits and data are what make programs work. This shows how spending is classified; the evidence tag shows whether the programs work.
- 83.2%
- spent a year
- $40.9M
- Funding risk
-

Bernie’s Book Bank
Free books for kids, birth to sixth grade
-
What “to programs” means
Of every dollar Bernie’s Book Bank spent, about 77 cents went to its programs: the services themselves. The rest paid for management and fundraising.
This is a three-year average (FY2022–FY2024) from its IRS filings. The median here is 82.0%.
Higher is not automatically better: staff, audits and data are what make programs work. This shows how spending is classified; the evidence tag shows whether the programs work.
- 76.9%
- spent a year
- $6.0M
-
-

Chicago Public Library Foundation
Funds library programs taxes do not cover
- Finances
FY2024 deficit of $1.36M, absorbed by $38.5M in net assets. Four consecutive deficits from FY2016 through FY2019.
-
What “to programs” means
Of every dollar Chicago Public Library Foundation spent, about 62 cents went to its programs: the services themselves. The rest paid for management and fundraising.
This is a three-year average (FY2022–FY2024) from its IRS filings. The median here is 82.0%.
Higher is not automatically better: staff, audits and data are what make programs work. This shows how spending is classified; the evidence tag shows whether the programs work.
- 62.3%
- spent a year
- $5.9M
- Finances
-

Chicago Scholars
Mentors first-generation students to college and career
- Finances
Three consecutive deficits: $987,000 in FY2023, $1.06M in FY2024 and $2.58M in FY2025, about $4.62M combined; net assets fell to $8.15M. Also consecutive in FY2019 and FY2020. No adverse news coverage was found; this comes from Form 990 data.
-
What “to programs” means
Of every dollar Chicago Scholars spent, about 72 cents went to its programs: the services themselves. The rest paid for management and fundraising.
This is a three-year average (FY2022–FY2024) from its IRS filings. The median here is 82.0%.
Higher is not automatically better: staff, audits and data are what make programs work. This shows how spending is classified; the evidence tag shows whether the programs work.
- 71.8%
- spent a year
- $7.6M
- Finances
-

Literacy Chicago
Free adult literacy, ESL and GED classes
- Funding risk
90% of revenue is government grants ($805,772 of $897,204).
-
What “to programs” means
Of every dollar Literacy Chicago spent, about 77 cents went to its programs: the services themselves. The rest paid for management and fundraising.
This is a three-year average (FY2022, FY2024, FY2025) from its IRS filings. The median here is 82.0%.
Higher is not automatically better: staff, audits and data are what make programs work. This shows how spending is classified; the evidence tag shows whether the programs work.
- 76.7%
- spent a year
- $706K
- Funding risk
-

One Million Degrees
Coaching and money for community college students
- Finances
Deficits of $1.39M in FY2024 and $1.67M in FY2025, following a FY2023 surplus of $19.2M — consistent with a planned spend-down during scale-up, with $22.9M in net assets. In April 2026 City Colleges announced a five-year expansion with more than $20M initial funding.
-
What “to programs” means
Of every dollar One Million Degrees spent, about 63 cents went to its programs: the services themselves. The rest paid for management and fundraising.
This is a three-year average (FY2022–FY2024) from its IRS filings. The median here is 82.0%.
Higher is not automatically better: staff, audits and data are what make programs work. This shows how spending is classified; the evidence tag shows whether the programs work.
- 63.1%
- spent a year
- $10.1M
- Finances
-

Open Books
Bookstores that fund K–12 literacy programs
- Finances
A $402,000 deficit in FY2025 as revenue fell about 22%, to $3.05M; net assets dropped from $2.54M to $2.14M. It then closed its Logan Square store on 1 March 2026, citing financial challenges.
- Labor record
Former Logan Square employees publicly criticized management over sudden terminations in March 2026.
-
What “to programs” means
Of every dollar Open Books spent, about 82 cents went to its programs: the services themselves. The rest paid for management and fundraising.
This is a three-year average (FY2022–FY2024) from its IRS filings. The median here is 82.0%.
Higher is not automatically better: staff, audits and data are what make programs work. This shows how spending is classified; the evidence tag shows whether the programs work.
- 82.0%
- spent a year
- $3.5M
- Finances
Housing and homelessness 7
-

All Chicago Making Homelessness History
Coordinates the homelessness response and emergency aid
- Finances
FY2023 deficit of $1.3M, back to a small surplus in FY2024. Revenue swings between $54.9M and $115.5M year to year because government rental assistance passes through the books.
- Funding risk
As the Continuum of Care lead agency it is the pass-through for federal homelessness funding, and HUD is weighing more than $60M in cuts that put an estimated 3,247 Chicagoans at risk. The FY2026 funding rules have since gone back and forth in court.
-
What “to programs” means
Of every dollar All Chicago Making Homelessness History spent, about 97 cents went to its programs: the services themselves. The rest paid for management and fundraising.
This is a three-year average (FY2022–FY2024) from its IRS filings. The median here is 82.0%.
Higher is not automatically better: staff, audits and data are what make programs work. This shows how spending is classified; the evidence tag shows whether the programs work.
- 96.8%
- spent a year
- $54.6M
- Finances
-

Breakthrough
Shelter, housing and services in one neighborhood
-
What “to programs” means
Of every dollar Breakthrough spent, about 89 cents went to its programs: the services themselves. The rest paid for management and fundraising.
This is a three-year average (FY2023–FY2025) from its IRS filings. The median here is 82.0%.
Higher is not automatically better: staff, audits and data are what make programs work. This shows how spending is classified; the evidence tag shows whether the programs work.
- 89.3%
- spent a year
- $14.0M
-
-

Chicago Coalition to End Homelessness
Homelessness policy, organizing and legal aid
-
What “to programs” means
Of every dollar Chicago Coalition to End Homelessness spent, about 86 cents went to its programs: the services themselves. The rest paid for management and fundraising.
This is a three-year average (FY2023–FY2025) from its IRS filings. The median here is 82.0%.
Higher is not automatically better: staff, audits and data are what make programs work. This shows how spending is classified; the evidence tag shows whether the programs work.
- 86.2%
- spent a year
- $6.7M
-
-

Deborah’s Place
Supportive housing for women who are homeless
- Funding risk
Its CEO has said on the record that a proposed federal 30% cap on HUD permanent-housing funds would force evictions at two of its buildings, including The Conservatory Apartments, home to 34 women.
-
What “to programs” means
Of every dollar Deborah’s Place spent, about 77 cents went to its programs: the services themselves. The rest paid for management and fundraising.
This is a three-year average (FY2023–FY2025) from its IRS filings. The median here is 82.0%.
Higher is not automatically better: staff, audits and data are what make programs work. This shows how spending is classified; the evidence tag shows whether the programs work.
- 77.0%
- spent a year
- $6.8M
- Funding risk
-

Franciscan Outreach
Interim shelters, meals and case management
- Audit finding
Its federal single audits for FY2024 and FY2025 both report a material weakness in internal controls.
-
What “to programs” means
Of every dollar Franciscan Outreach spent, about 79 cents went to its programs: the services themselves. The rest paid for management and fundraising.
This is a three-year average (FY2022–FY2024) from its IRS filings. The median here is 82.0%.
Higher is not automatically better: staff, audits and data are what make programs work. This shows how spending is classified; the evidence tag shows whether the programs work.
- 79.2%
- spent a year
- $6.7M
- Audit finding
-

La Casa Norte
Shelter and housing for homeless youth and families
- Finances
Its FY2024 Form 990 shows a $10.47M deficit and negative net assets of $789,000. The audited consolidated statements explain it as the unwinding of a New Markets Tax Credit financing, in which $12.5M of notes were forgiven: consolidated results were a $5.27M surplus in 2024 and a $403,000 deficit in 2025, with $15.3M in net assets and a clean audit. Earlier deficits were small: $263,000 in FY2022 and $33,000 in FY2023.
- Funding risk
66% of 2025 revenue ($6.07M of $9.23M) came from government grants.
-
What “to programs” means
The share of a charity’s spending that goes to its programs, rather than to management and fundraising. La Casa Norte has no published figure.
- not published
- spent a year
- $21.0M
- Finances
-

The Night Ministry
Overnight outreach, street medicine and youth shelter
- Finances
A $237,000 deficit in FY2025, as revenue fell from $12.06M in FY2023 to $10.61M.
-
What “to programs” means
Of every dollar The Night Ministry spent, about 71 cents went to its programs: the services themselves. The rest paid for management and fundraising.
This is a three-year average (FY2022–FY2024) from its IRS filings. The median here is 82.0%.
Higher is not automatically better: staff, audits and data are what make programs work. This shows how spending is classified; the evidence tag shows whether the programs work.
- 71.0%
- spent a year
- $10.8M
- Finances
Legal aid and civic accountability 5
-

Chicago Votes Education Fund
Registers young and incarcerated voters
- Finances
Two consecutive deficits: $770,000 in FY2022 and $218,000 in FY2023, recovered to a $714,000 surplus in FY2024.
-
What “to programs” means
Of every dollar Chicago Votes Education Fund spent, about 78 cents went to its programs: the services themselves. The rest paid for management and fundraising.
This is a three-year average (FY2022–FY2024) from its IRS filings. The median here is 82.0%.
Higher is not automatically better: staff, audits and data are what make programs work. This shows how spending is classified; the evidence tag shows whether the programs work.
- 77.8%
- spent a year
- $1.5M
- Finances
-

Invisible Institute
Police accountability journalism and public records
-
What “to programs” means
Of every dollar Invisible Institute spent, about 72 cents went to its programs: the services themselves. The rest paid for management and fundraising.
This is a three-year average (FY2022–FY2024) from its IRS filings. The median here is 82.0%.
Higher is not automatically better: staff, audits and data are what make programs work. This shows how spending is classified; the evidence tag shows whether the programs work.
- 71.7%
- spent a year
- $2.0M
-
-

Legal Aid Chicago
Free civil legal help for people in poverty
-
What “to programs” means
Of every dollar Legal Aid Chicago spent, about 81 cents went to its programs: the services themselves. The rest paid for management and fundraising.
This is a three-year average (FY2022–FY2024) from its IRS filings. The median here is 82.0%.
Higher is not automatically better: staff, audits and data are what make programs work. This shows how spending is classified; the evidence tag shows whether the programs work.
- 81.1%
- spent a year
- $25.7M
-
-

National Immigrant Justice Center
Legal representation for immigrants and asylum seekers
-
What “to programs” means
The share of a charity’s spending that goes to its programs, rather than to management and fundraising. National Immigrant Justice Center has no published figure.
- not published
- spent a year
- $16.3M
-
-

The Resurrection Project
Affordable housing and immigration legal services
- Finances
Two consecutive deficits: $2.08M in FY2021 and $3.76M in FY2022. Recovered to a $744,000 surplus in FY2024, but Charity Navigator’s financial health sub-score is 0.50 and the overall rating is two stars, tied for the lowest here.
- Funding risk
Signed an April 2026 letter opposing the Justice Department’s dismantling of the Recognition and Accreditation program, which allows non-attorney immigration representation — a risk to how it delivers legal services.
-
What “to programs” means
Of every dollar The Resurrection Project spent, about 98 cents went to its programs: the services themselves. The rest paid for management and fundraising.
This is a three-year average (FY2022–FY2024) from its IRS filings. The median here is 82.0%.
Higher is not automatically better: staff, audits and data are what make programs work. This shows how spending is classified; the evidence tag shows whether the programs work.
- 97.9%
- spent a year
- $44.8M
- Finances
Violence prevention and youth 5
-

Chicago Children’s Advocacy Center
One place where abused children get help
- Finances
Five consecutive deficits from FY2020 through FY2024, about $2.27M cumulative on a roughly $8M budget, then a sharp reversal to a $1.88M surplus in FY2025 on a revenue jump. The cause of the reversal is not public, so do not assume it recurs.
-
What “to programs” means
Of every dollar Chicago Children’s Advocacy Center spent, about 77 cents went to its programs: the services themselves. The rest paid for management and fundraising.
This is a three-year average (FY2022–FY2024) from its IRS filings. The median here is 82.0%.
Higher is not automatically better: staff, audits and data are what make programs work. This shows how spending is classified; the evidence tag shows whether the programs work.
- 77.1%
- spent a year
- $10.5M
- Finances
-

Chicago CRED
Outreach, therapy and jobs for those at highest risk
- Finances
FY2024 deficit of $10.24M, on record-high expenses against sharply lower revenue. Consecutive deficits in FY2021 and FY2022, then a large FY2023 surplus.
-
What “to programs” means
The share of a charity’s spending that goes to its programs, rather than to management and fundraising. Chicago CRED has no published figure.
- not published
- spent a year
- $36.3M
- Finances
-

Institute for Nonviolence Chicago
Street outreach and violence interruption
- Finances
Three consecutive deficits FY2022 through FY2024, all small, returning to surplus in FY2025.
- Funding risk
Contributions are 99.7% of revenue, which is severe funder concentration.
-
What “to programs” means
Of every dollar Institute for Nonviolence Chicago spent, about 93 cents went to its programs: the services themselves. The rest paid for management and fundraising.
This is a three-year average (FY2022–FY2024) from its IRS filings. The median here is 82.0%.
Higher is not automatically better: staff, audits and data are what make programs work. This shows how spending is classified; the evidence tag shows whether the programs work.
- 92.9%
- spent a year
- $15.7M
- Finances
-

Metropolitan Family Services
Family services and violence intervention region-wide
-
What “to programs” means
Of every dollar Metropolitan Family Services spent, about 88 cents went to its programs: the services themselves. The rest paid for management and fundraising.
This is a three-year average (FY2022–FY2024) from its IRS filings. The median here is 82.0%.
Higher is not automatically better: staff, audits and data are what make programs work. This shows how spending is classified; the evidence tag shows whether the programs work.
- 87.7%
- spent a year
- $178M
-
-

Youth Guidance
School counseling programs, including Becoming A Man
- Finances
Three consecutive and worsening deficits — $655,000 in FY2023, $6.61M in FY2024 and $10.46M in FY2025, roughly $17.7M cumulative. Revenue fell from $58.99M in FY2022 to $44.26M in FY2025 while expenses peaked at $56.1M in FY2024. No reporting of layoffs or leadership change was found and the cause is not public.
- Funding risk
In November 2025 the city cut mentoring funding from $9.5M to $4.6M and made school-based group counseling such as Becoming A Man and Working on Womanhood ineligible for city funds, affecting about 1,400 students at 33 schools from January 2026.
-
What “to programs” means
Of every dollar Youth Guidance spent, about 82 cents went to its programs: the services themselves. The rest paid for management and fundraising.
This is a three-year average (FY2023–FY2025) from its IRS filings. The median here is 82.0%.
Higher is not automatically better: staff, audits and data are what make programs work. This shows how spending is classified; the evidence tag shows whether the programs work.
- 82.0%
- spent a year
- $54.7M
- Finances
Jobs and job training 1
-

Cara Collective
Job training and placement for people facing barriers
-
What “to programs” means
Of every dollar Cara Collective spent, about 75 cents went to its programs: the services themselves. The rest paid for management and fundraising.
This is a three-year average (FY2023–FY2025) from its IRS filings. The median here is 82.0%.
Higher is not automatically better: staff, audits and data are what make programs work. This shows how spending is classified; the evidence tag shows whether the programs work.
- 75.1%
- spent a year
- $16.6M
-
Health 2
-

Erie Family Health Centers
Community health centers, regardless of ability to pay
- Incident
A breach of its network from 10 December 2025 to 27 January 2026 exposed patient data including Social Security numbers and medical records. Notices went to up to 570,000 people from May 2026.
-
What “to programs” means
Of every dollar Erie Family Health Centers spent, about 86 cents went to its programs: the services themselves. The rest paid for management and fundraising.
This is a three-year average (FY2022–FY2024) from its IRS filings. The median here is 82.0%.
Higher is not automatically better: staff, audits and data are what make programs work. This shows how spending is classified; the evidence tag shows whether the programs work.
- 86.2%
- spent a year
- $122M
- Incident
-

Howard Brown Health
Health center focused on LGBTQ+ patients
- Finances
FY2024 deficit of about $4.9M after three to four years of management-described operating shortfalls, then an $11.2M surplus in FY2025, with $130.6M in net assets. No going-concern warning. Down from 11 locations in 2019 to seven.
- Labor record
December 2022: 65 positions cut, citing a $12M shortfall. January 2023: roughly 440 employees struck for three days. July 2023: the National Labor Relations Board found unfair labor practices. May 2024: a contract was ratified after the CEO resigned, and two clinics closed. July 2024: 43 more layoffs, about 7% of staff, which the interim CEO described as the third consecutive year of an operating shortfall. November 2024: a $1.108M NLRB settlement covering 55 laid-off workers. A new CEO was named in February 2025 and no labor actions have been found since.
-
What “to programs” means
Of every dollar Howard Brown Health spent, about 88 cents went to its programs: the services themselves. The rest paid for management and fundraising.
This is a three-year average (FY2022–FY2024) from its IRS filings. The median here is 82.0%.
Higher is not automatically better: staff, audits and data are what make programs work. This shows how spending is classified; the evidence tag shows whether the programs work.
- 87.9%
- spent a year
- $206M
- Finances
Women and survivors 3
-

Apna Ghar
Crisis support for immigrant survivors of violence
- Funding risk
52.3% of revenue is government funding, a concentration risk their own auditor flags.
-
What “to programs” means
Of every dollar Apna Ghar spent, about 79 cents went to its programs: the services themselves. The rest paid for management and fundraising.
This is a three-year average (FY2022–FY2024) from its IRS filings. The median here is 82.0%.
Higher is not automatically better: staff, audits and data are what make programs work. This shows how spending is classified; the evidence tag shows whether the programs work.
- 78.9%
- spent a year
- $5.1M
- Funding risk
-

Chicago Foundation for Women
Grants to groups serving women and girls
- Finances
A $3.25M deficit in FY2025 as revenue fell 52%, to $3.27M. Net assets held at about $24.1M, so it can absorb this, but it is a large gap.
-
What “to programs” means
Of every dollar Chicago Foundation for Women spent, about 85 cents went to its programs: the services themselves. The rest paid for management and fundraising.
This is a three-year average (FY2022–FY2024) from its IRS filings. The median here is 82.0%.
Higher is not automatically better: staff, audits and data are what make programs work. This shows how spending is classified; the evidence tag shows whether the programs work.
- 85.2%
- spent a year
- $6.5M
- Finances
-

Connections for Abused Women and their Children
Hotline, shelter and advocacy for domestic violence survivors
- Finances
A $1.05M deficit in FY2025 as revenue fell to $4.22M from $5.38M the year before.
-
What “to programs” means
Of every dollar Connections for Abused Women and their Children spent, about 73 cents went to its programs: the services themselves. The rest paid for management and fundraising.
This is a three-year average (FY2022–FY2024) from its IRS filings. The median here is 82.0%.
Higher is not automatically better: staff, audits and data are what make programs work. This shows how spending is classified; the evidence tag shows whether the programs work.
- 72.5%
- spent a year
- $5.3M
- Finances
Environment and land 3
-

Friends of the Chicago River
Cleanups and restoration for the Chicago River
- Finances
Four consecutive deficit years, FY2021 through FY2024 — $24,000, $306,000, $41,000 and $348,000 — before recovering to a $21,964 surplus in FY2025. The smallest financial cushion in this guide.
-
What “to programs” means
Of every dollar Friends of the Chicago River spent, about 81 cents went to its programs: the services themselves. The rest paid for management and fundraising.
This is a three-year average (FY2023–FY2025) from its IRS filings. The median here is 82.0%.
Higher is not automatically better: staff, audits and data are what make programs work. This shows how spending is classified; the evidence tag shows whether the programs work.
- 80.5%
- spent a year
- $2.5M
- Finances
-

Openlands
Protects open space and plants urban trees
- Finances
The apparent FY2023 deficit of $2.82M reflects the deliberate donation of the 71.55-acre Openlands Lakeshore Preserve plus about $1.36M to the Lake County Forest Preserves, completed 30 August 2023.
-
What “to programs” means
Of every dollar Openlands spent, about 83 cents went to its programs: the services themselves. The rest paid for management and fundraising.
This is a three-year average (FY2022–FY2024) from its IRS filings. The median here is 82.0%.
Higher is not automatically better: staff, audits and data are what make programs work. This shows how spending is classified; the evidence tag shows whether the programs work.
- 82.9%
- spent a year
- $7.7M
- Finances
-

Urban Growers Collective
Urban farms, youth jobs and a mobile market
- Finances
A $1.12M deficit in FY2023 after revenue fell 36% from a pandemic-relief peak of $4.43M in FY2021, recovered to a $377,000 surplus in FY2024.
-
What “to programs” means
Of every dollar Urban Growers Collective spent, about 73 cents went to its programs: the services themselves. The rest paid for management and fundraising.
This is a three-year average (FY2022–FY2024) from its IRS filings. The median here is 82.0%.
Higher is not automatically better: staff, audits and data are what make programs work. This shows how spending is classified; the evidence tag shows whether the programs work.
- 72.6%
- spent a year
- $4.3M
- Finances
Looking for a charity that is not here? Check any charity yourself in three public records.
How we check.
Each charity was checked on September 25, 2026 against its IRS Form 990, its Charity Navigator record and its own reports, and every donation link was opened to confirm it works. Nothing here is paid for, and nothing is ranked on a single score.
How it’s made
GiveChi is generated with AI and overseen by Cody Heart. Claude, an AI model made by Anthropic, gathered the records, wrote the summaries and built the site. Cody Heart sets its direction and reviews the work.
AI can get things wrong. Each charity’s details link to the filings and sources behind its figures, so check the ones that matter to you before a large gift.
What the numbers mean
- To programs
- The share of spending that goes to programs, averaged over three years. The median here is 82.0%. It shows how spending is classified; the evidence tag shows whether the programs work.
- Charity Navigator score
- A Charity Navigator score is built from up to four separate assessments, called beacons. Almost every organization here has completed only one of them — Accountability & Finance, which measures financial disclosure and governance. It says nothing about whether the programs work. A 100/100 means the books are clean and public, and no more than that.
- Spent a year
- Total expenses from the latest readable filing. Size measures reach.
- Result
- Revenue minus expenses in that year. A deficit is shown in red and explained under Worth knowing.
Evidence
- Randomized trial
Tested against a control group. The strongest evidence available for social programs.
- Independent study
Evaluated by an outside researcher. Includes studies the organization commissioned itself.
- Self-reported
Counted by the organization itself. No outside evaluation of the program’s effect is on file here.
Cautions
Every note on the record stays in. The ones that bear most on a gift (finances, funding risk, labor record, audit finding, incident) show on the cards; the rest wait in each charity’s details.
Making a small gift count
- Ask if your employer matches it
- Many employers match their staff’s gifts, often dollar for dollar. Check your benefits portal or ask HR before you give, then send the receipt in.
- Deduct it without itemizing
- From the 2026 tax year, you can deduct up to $1,000 in cash gifts to charities like these, or $2,000 for a married couple filing jointly, even if you take the standard deduction. If you itemize, gifts count above 0.5% of your income. Gifts through donor-advised funds do not qualify for the new deduction.
- Give a little every month
- Ten dollars a month is $120 a year, and a steady gift lets a charity plan staff and programs ahead. Each charity’s details say whether its form offers recurring gifts, and your saved list can add a reminder to your calendar.
- Give time
- Where a charity takes volunteers, its details link to how to sign up.
Tax rules: Fidelity Charitable, on the 2026 changes, opens in a new tab. Check your own situation with a tax professional.
Giving safely
Every Donate button here goes to the charity’s own site or the payment platform it uses, each checked by hand. Anywhere else, these are the signs the Federal Trade Commission says to watch for.
- Pressure to give right now
- A real charity will still take your gift tomorrow. Scammers push for an answer on the spot.
- Cash, gift cards, wire transfers or crypto
- Only scammers ask to be paid this way. A credit card or a check leaves a record you can dispute.
- A name that is almost right
- Lookalike names borrow a known charity’s trust. Match the EIN to the one listed here, or look the charity up in the Illinois Attorney General’s registry.
To check a charity that is not listed here, look up its Form 990 on ProPublica Nonprofit Explorer, opens in a new tab, its Illinois registration in the Attorney General’s charity registry, opens in a new tab and its rating, if it has one, on Charity Navigator, opens in a new tab.
Warning signs: Federal Trade Commission, on charity scams, opens in a new tab.
Questions
- How were these organizations checked?
- Each one was checked on September 25, 2026 against its IRS Form 990, its Charity Navigator record and its own reports, and every donation link was opened to confirm it works. A Chicago charity missing from this list has not been judged.
- What do the evidence tags mean?
- Randomized trial: the program was tested against a control group, the strongest proof that it works. Independent study: an outside researcher evaluated it. Self-reported: the organization counts its own results.
- How much of my donation reaches programs?
- Between 62 and 98 percent here, shown for every charity as a three-year average. It shows how spending is classified, and the evidence tag shows whether the programs work.
- Are donations tax deductible?
- For 37 of the 39, yes. From the 2026 tax year that includes up to $1,000 in cash gifts ($2,000 for a married couple filing jointly) even if you take the standard deduction; itemizers deduct gifts above 0.5% of income. Chicago CRED is a private operating foundation with different deduction rules, and gifts to Chicago Votes are deductible only through its Education Fund, which this page links. Each entry lists its EIN.
- Why is there no overall ranking?
- Financial ratios, ratings and program evidence measure different things, and one combined score would invent precision. The picker ranks by one priority at a time, and you choose which.
- How current is this information?
- Checked on September 25, 2026. Financial figures come from each organization’s latest readable filing: FY2025 for 29 and FY2024 for ten.
Sources
- IRS Form 990 filingsProPublica Nonprofit Explorer, opens in a new tab
- Charity ratings and program ratiosCharity Navigator, opens in a new tab
- Audited financial statements and impact reportingeach organization’s own site
- Local news reportingcited on the entries that use it
If a link is dead or a figure is wrong, it gets fixed.
Photographs and logos
Each photograph shows a charity’s own work and is from Wikimedia Commons under a free license. Each is cropped for this site and shared under its original license.
Each charity’s logo is its own, taken from its own website and shown only to identify it. Logos belong to their organizations, and no charity listed here endorses or sponsors GiveChi.
- Walkers at the start of the Food Depository’s Hunger Walk, 2017Greater Chicago Food Depository, photo of Walkers at the start of the Food Depository’s Hunger Walk, 2017 on Wikimedia Commons, opens in a new tab, CC BY-SA 4.0 license, opens in a new tab
- Volunteers at work in Common Pantry, 2019Preston Keres, USDA, photo of Volunteers at work in Common Pantry, 2019 on Wikimedia Commons, opens in a new tab, public domain
- Claudia Valenzuela of NIJC’s Detention Project at a rally against family separation, 2018Charles Edward Miller, photo of Claudia Valenzuela of NIJC’s Detention Project at a rally against family separation, 2018 on Wikimedia Commons, opens in a new tab, CC BY-SA 2.0 license, opens in a new tab
- The Invisible Institute’s storefront newsroom, 2022Gabriela Tumani, News21, photo of The Invisible Institute’s storefront newsroom, 2022 on Wikimedia Commons, opens in a new tab, CC BY 3.0 US license, opens in a new tab
- Youth Guidance’s Project Prepare at the Bud Billiken Parade, 2015Daniel X. O’Neil, photo of Youth Guidance’s Project Prepare at the Bud Billiken Parade, 2015 on Wikimedia Commons, opens in a new tab, CC BY 2.0 license, opens in a new tab
- Howard Brown Health’s float in the Chicago Pride Parade, 2007Richie Diesterheft, photo of Howard Brown Health’s float in the Chicago Pride Parade, 2007 on Wikimedia Commons, opens in a new tab, CC BY 2.0 license, opens in a new tab
- Friends of the Chicago River canoes on the North Branch at River Park, 2019Raed Mansour, photo of Friends of the Chicago River canoes on the North Branch at River Park, 2019 on Wikimedia Commons, opens in a new tab, CC BY 2.0 license, opens in a new tab